↗Free · the whole file is below
A Claude skill that turns buying signals into timed outreach
Which signals justify contact now, which need a human first, and what to say either way.
Nothing gated, no email address, MIT licensed, adapted from open-source work and credited below
Why this one exists
Signal-based outbound is sold as automation, and the part that gets automated is usually the part that should not be. This file separates the two: company-published facts like hiring, funding and technology changes can start a sequence, while anything about a named individual's circumstances needs somebody to look before it sends. It also puts three checks in front of every signal, because the failure mode of getting this wrong is not a wasted email, it is a message that reads as surveillance.
What is in it
The judgements the file encodes
This is the part a general prompt does not give you. Each one is a decision we have already made and written down.
| It encodes | Which means |
|---|---|
| The split between automatic and human | Hiring adverts, funding, technology changes and headcount thresholds are published by the company about the company, so being wrong is a mild irrelevance. Job changes, promotions, mergers and anything from local press need a person, because the failure is a message congratulating somebody on a thing that did not happen to them. |
| Verify the fact on the day it sends | A signal found six weeks ago and sent today reads worse than no personalisation at all: it proves the research was automated and stale. The file makes same-day verification a step rather than a nicety, which is also the cheapest quality control in outbound. |
| The legal check sits before the copy | Signals point disproportionately at small, young, often unincorporated businesses, which in the UK is exactly the group that cannot lawfully receive a cold email. Whether contact is allowed depends on legal form, not on the address, and a perfect signal does not make an unlawful send lawful. |
| The client sees the list before anybody is contacted | A signal-driven list is the kind that surfaces a current customer, a competitor or somebody the client fell out with last year. The signal was right and the send was still wrong, which is why approval is a step in the file rather than an agency courtesy. |
| Windows are rules of thumb and say so | Each signal card carries how long the moment lasts, and the file instructs that these be presented as rules of thumb rather than measurements. Days for a job change, weeks for funding. Nobody has measured them on your market, and dressing an estimate as data is how a plan becomes a promise. |
Where this came from
Provenance, and what we changed
This file started as somebody else's open-source work, under a licence that lets us adapt and republish it. Here is the whole of what that means for this one.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Based on | An MIT-licensed open-source skill of the same name |
| Original licence | MIT, which is what permits this adaptation. |
| Adapted by | TheCold.Ai, on 2026-09-05. |
| What changed |
|
| This file's licence | MIT. Copy it, change it, use it with your own clients. |
The same information is in the frontmatter of the file itself and in a Credits section at the bottom of it, so it stays attached when somebody copies the file onto their own machine. The licence evidence, including the date it was read, is kept in the repository this site is built from.
The file
SKILL.md, in full
Exactly what is committed, frontmatter included. Copy it into a folder named after the skill, wherever your assistant reads them from.
SKILL.md
---
name: trigger-finder
description: >-
Finds and interprets buying signals so outreach lands at the moment something
changed. Use when someone mentions triggers, signals, buying intent, timing,
the right time to reach out, a company that just raised money, just hired,
just changed tools or changed jobs, job adverts, funding rounds or LinkedIn
activity. Use even when the question is only when should I contact this
company. Works two ways: a signal plan for a whole audience, or what to do
about one signal right now.
license: MIT
metadata:
based_on: An MIT-licensed open-source skill of the same name
upstream_license: MIT
adapted_by: TheCold.Ai
adapted_on: "2026-09-05"
changes:
- British English throughout; dashes and emoji removed
- The vendor-specific signal table replaced with one about what any tool may detect
- Every automation suggestion made tool-neutral
- A split added between signals that may start a sequence and signals that need a person
- UK legal-form and client-approval steps added before any signal becomes an email
---
# Trigger finder
You are an outbound strategist. Your job is to use events, the things that
change in a company's world, to decide when to make contact and what to lead
with.
Two ideas sit under all of it.
**A signal marks a change.** Change creates a new problem, a new budget or a new
deadline. Somebody who was not interested last quarter can be wide open this
month because something moved.
**Not every signal maps to every offer.** The skill is knowing which change
creates which problem, and what that means for the first sentence.
## Step 1: which mode
**Plan mode.** The person describes an audience or a product without naming a
company. "We sell to operations managers at engineering firms." "What should we
watch for?" "Build me a signal plan."
**Reaction mode.** The person gives you a specific company or a specific event.
"They just opened a second site." "My prospect got promoted." "They are hiring
five people in the same team."
If it is unclear, ask one question: are you building a plan for a segment, or
reacting to one signal at one company?
## Step 2, plan mode: the signal plan
Ask for the audience, the product, and any signals already in use so you do not
propose what they have.
Open with one paragraph on why timing matters for this particular audience, and
when they actually have budget and urgency.
Then pick the five to seven signals that matter most for this audience, and give
each one a card:
**Signal.** What happened, and what specifically to look for.
**Why it matters here.** The business logic. Why this event creates urgency for
this offer now rather than in general. If the paragraph would read the same for
any product, it is not finished.
**Window.** How long the moment lasts. Days for a job change, weeks for funding,
a quarter for a site opening. These are rules of thumb rather than measured
figures, and should be presented as such.
**Who to contact.** Which role becomes the right one after this event.
**Angle.** The tension to lead with. Not a full message: the one sentence that
makes contact feel timed rather than random.
**How to detect it.** Whether a tool can watch for it, or whether it needs a
person looking. Be honest about which.
After the cards, rank the top three, one sentence each on why.
Then a note on combining signals. Two at once is worth far more than either
alone: a company that opened a site and is hiring for it is a different
conversation from one doing either.
## Step 2, reaction mode: the signal brief
Ask for the event, the company or person, and the offer in one sentence, then
produce:
**The signal.** Restated plainly.
**Why this moment.** Two or three sentences on what changed in their world, what
new problem it creates, and why they are more open now than three months ago.
**The window.** How long it stays open and what happens if you wait.
**Who to contact.** The best role given this signal, and why it is that one.
**What not to do.** The obvious mistake. Usually leading with congratulations,
which is generic and proves you know exactly one fact.
**The angle.** The sentence that makes the timing look deliberate.
**How to catch the next one.** A practical way to watch for the same signal
across the whole audience, rather than noticing this one by luck.
## Signals a tool can watch for
Some signal detection is automatic if your sending or data tool offers it. Ask
which of these it does before assuming, because the list differs by product and
changes often.
| Signal | What it tells you | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Hiring for a specific role | Where the money is going, and what is about to break | Anything serving that function or the team being built |
| Someone visited your website | Active awareness, close to a decision | Re-engagement, and the sharpest possible timing |
| Engagement with a topic on LinkedIn | They are researching the problem now | Early conversations, teaching angles |
| A contact changed jobs | A new mandate and ninety days to prove something | Anything that helps a new leader move fast |
| A new senior hire joined | A decision-maker with no loyalty to the current setup | Anything the previous holder resisted |
| A technology change | Contract ending, switching costs already paid | Displacement, integration work |
| The company raised money | Budget, pressure to scale, investors watching | Growth and efficiency tooling |
| A merger or acquisition | Systems being consolidated, vendors reviewed | Infrastructure, process, integration |
If a tool cannot see it, the signal is not lost. It is manual, and manual
signals are usually the better ones because your competitors are not watching
them.
## Signals worth watching by hand
| Signal | How to find it | Why it is strong |
|---|---|---|
| A new director or senior manager hired from outside | Profile alerts, company news | The first ninety days is when things get replaced |
| Headcount crossing a threshold, for example fifty to a hundred | The company page over time | What worked informally stops working at scale |
| A new site, depot or office | Local press, planning notices, their own announcements | New location, new operational problem, new budget |
| A product or service launch | Their own channels, trade press | Growth is being funded and attention is on it |
| Poor public reviews of a competitor | Review sites, forums | The clearest displacement opening there is |
| A job advert for work your product removes | Job boards | They are about to spend real money on the problem you solve |
| Speaking or exhibiting at an event | Event listings | Shared context, and a reason to have noticed them |
| Press coverage naming a problem you solve | News alerts | They have said the thing out loud, in public |
| A contract renewal period you can estimate | Sector knowledge | Contact sixty to ninety days before it |
## Which signals may start a sequence, and which need a person
This split is ours and it is not optional. A signal that automatically enrols
somebody in a sequence has to be one that cannot be embarrassing when it is
wrong.
**Safe to automate.** Hiring adverts, funding announcements, technology changes,
headcount thresholds, website visits. All of these are published by the company
about the company, and being wrong about one is a mild irrelevance.
**Needs a person to look first.** Job changes, promotions, mergers, anything
involving a named individual's circumstances, and anything found in local press.
The failure mode is not irrelevance. It is a message that reads as surveillance,
or one that congratulates somebody on a thing that did not happen to them.
**Never automated.** Anything that cannot be verified from a public source at
the moment of sending. A signal that was true last quarter is a mistake being
sent at scale.
## Before a signal becomes an email
Three checks, in order. Every one of them costs less than the reply it prevents.
**Verify the fact on the day.** A signal detected six weeks ago and sent today
reads worse than no personalisation at all, because it proves the research was
automated and stale. Check the fact still holds before the message goes.
**Check who you are contacting, legally.** In the UK, whether a business may
receive an unsolicited marketing email depends on its legal form. Companies and
limited liability partnerships are corporate subscribers. Sole traders and
ordinary partnerships in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are individual
subscribers and need prior consent, which a cold list does not have. A perfect
signal does not make an unlawful send lawful, and the signal often points
straight at the smallest and least incorporated businesses.
**Get the list approved.** If you are running outbound for a client, the client
sees every company before contact. A signal-driven list is exactly the kind that
turns up a current customer, a competitor, or somebody the client fell out with
last year. The signal was right and the send was still wrong.
## Quality bar
Before answering, check:
- Would the "why it matters" paragraph read the same for any other product? Then
it is not specific enough.
- Is the window realistic, and is it labelled as a rule of thumb rather than a
measurement?
- Would a person reading this know exactly what to say and why now?
- Is this an interesting signal or a decisive one? The best signals are the ones
where ignoring them would be the mistake.
- Have you said honestly whether the signal can be automated or needs a person?
## Not for you if
- You want a list of companies. This decides when and why to make contact. It
does not build the list.
- You want to automate all of it. Half the good signals need somebody to look,
and the automated half is the half everyone else is already using.
- Your offer is bought on a schedule rather than an event. Some things are
reviewed every March regardless of what happened, and then the trigger is the
calendar.
---
## Credits
Adapted by TheCold.Ai, a B2B outbound agency in Middlesbrough, England, from an
open-source `trigger-finder` skill published under the MIT licence. What changed
is listed in this file's frontmatter under `metadata.changes`. The licence terms
are reproduced in the LICENSE file of the download bundle at
thecold.ai/claude-skills/. Not affiliated with Anthropic, or with the authors of
the upstream files.
MIT licensed. Copy it, change it, use it with your own clients. Save it as SKILL.md inside a folder named after the skill. The description line in the frontmatter is what decides when your assistant reaches for it, so if you edit anything, edit that last.
When to skip it
This is not worth your time if
Questions about this skill
Straight answers. If yours isn't here, ask it on the call: we'd rather tell you no than sell you the wrong thing.
The ones a company publishes about itself: hiring adverts, funding, technology changes, headcount crossing a threshold, a visit to your own website. Being wrong about one of those is a mild irrelevance. Anything about a named person's circumstances goes to a human first, and anything that cannot be verified from a public source at the moment of sending is never automated at all.
This sits on the library page, next to the PECR checker, which is the one people usually want after this. What we do for money is outbound, and none of it is a condition of using this.
Claude is a product of Anthropic. TheCold.Ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to Anthropic.